Legal Opinion
Timken Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 11, 1992No. Court 90-12-00687PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
Plaintiff, The Timken Company (“Timken”), moves pursuant to Rule 56.1 of the Rules of this Court for judgment upon the agency record to contest the determination of the International Trade Administration of the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or “ITA”) in Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, From the Republic of Hungary (“Final Results”), 55 Fed.Reg. 48,146 (1990).
Background
On June 19, 1987, it was affirmatively determined by Commerce that tapered roller bearings…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- The Timken Company v. The United States, and China National MacHinery and Equipment Import and Export CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rhodia, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Luoyang Bearing Factory v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Nation Ford Chem. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.