Nation Ford Chem. Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
DiCarlo, Senior Judge:
Plaintiff Nation Ford, the sole domestic producer of sulfanilic acid, challenges the final results of the antidumping *1372administrative review found in Sulfanilic Acid from the People’s Republic of China, 61 Fed. Reg. 53,711 (Dep’t Commerce 1996) (final admin, review) [hereinafter Final Determination], The review covered the period from August 31,1993 to July 1,1994. The court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c) (1994). Nation Ford claims that Commerce undervalued the cost to Chinese producers of aniline, the primary raw material used in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Tianjin MacHinery Import & Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Nation Ford Chemical Company v. United States, and Yude Chemical Company, Zhenxing Chemical Industry Company and Pht International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Goldlink Industries Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Coalition for the Preservation of American Brake Drum & Rotor Aftermarket Manufacturers v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Rhodia, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.