Legal Opinion
Peters v. Cars To Go, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided November 16, 1998No. 1:97-CV-920PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
In this action, Plaintiffs, Mark G. Peters (“Peters”) and Alen Piechowski (“Piechowski”), allege that Defendants, Cars To Go, Inc. (“Cars”) and Mercury Finance Company of Michigan (“Mercury”), violated the Truth In Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601 to 1667f, in connection with Plaintiffs’ purchases of automobiles from Cars. Plaintiffs allege in their second amended class action complaint that Defendants violated the TILA by failing to disclose the price of a vehicle service contract (“VSC”) as a “finance charge” in the TILA disclosure statement and failing…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Musson Theatrical, Inc., and Modernage Photo Service, Inc., for Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stout v. J.D. ByriderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Rockey v. Courtesy Motors, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
- In re Onstar Contract LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Lozada v. Dale Baker Oldsmobile, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000
- Rugumbwa v. Betten Motor SalesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.