Legal Opinion
Rugumbwa v. Betten Motor Sales
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided March 29, 2001No. 1:00-CV-363PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRENNEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, Sylvester Rugambwa, claims that defendant Betten Motor Sales (“Betten”) violated provisions of the Truth In Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., and various state statutes with respect to his July 10, 1999, purchase of a 1991 Toyota Camry. This matter is before the court on plaintiffs motion for class certification (docket no. 8).
I. Background
Plaintiff alleges in his second amended class action complaint that as part of his vehicle purchase, Betten charged plaintiff $1,495.00 for a vehicle service contract, also known as…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Taylor v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
- Frankel v. DETROIT MEDICAL CENTERDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- Gaines v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGANDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Nevarez v. O'Connor Chevrolet, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Richard v. Oak Tree Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.