Legal Opinion
In re Onstar Contract Litigation
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 19, 2011No. 2:07-MDL-01867PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
SEAN F. COX, District Judge.
Buyers and lessees of automobiles equipped with OnStar telematics equipment filed prospective class action complaints against four automobile manufacturers (General Motors Corporation (“GM”), American Honda Motor Company (“Honda”), Subaru of America (“Subaru”), and Volkswagen of America (“VW”)), and OnStar Corporation (“OnStar”), asserting consumer protection act and warranty claims. Those actions were consolidated for pretrial proceedings by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. The…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Avio, Inc. v. Alfoccino, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- Davidson v. Henkel Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.