Musson Theatrical, Inc., and Modernage Photo Service, Inc., for Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Federal Express Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs (“Musson”) appeal the dismissal of federal common law claims of fraud and misrepresentation against Federal Express. Musson also appeals the district court’s ruling that state common law claims against Federal Express, pending in a simultaneous state court proceeding, are preempted by the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978. We affirm the district court’s dismissal of Musson’s federal claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, but vacate its ruling concerning Musson’s state law claims and direct that the district court dismiss these claims without…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by756 opinions
- Fritz v. Charter Township of Com-StockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Samad Salehpour v. University of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Graham A. Peters v. The Lincoln Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Patricia Scott v. Clay County, Tennessee Chinn Anderson Billy Pierce Michael ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Kenneth C. Voyticky v. Village of Timberlake, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
751 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.