Legal Opinion

Rockey v. Courtesy Motors, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided March 13, 2001No. 1:00CV695PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCOVILLE, United States Magistrate Judge.

This is an action brought by purchasers of a used truck against the dealership, which sold them an extended warranty as part of the transaction. Plaintiffs Michael Rockey and Terry Rockey, husband and wife, are residents of Kent County, Michigan. Plaintiffs allege that on August 15, 2000, they purchased a 1997 Chevrolet Blazer from defendant Courtesy Motors, Inc., doing business in Kent County as Courtesy Dodge. Plaintiffs purchased an extended warranty on the Blazer. On the retail installment contract, under “amounts paid to others,” $1,590 was…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2006
  2. Parkinson v. Hyundai Motor AmericaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
  3. Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
  4. Beattie v. Centurytel, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
  5. Lozada v. Dale Baker Oldsmobile, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API