Legal Opinion

Home Savings Bank v. Savransky

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 31, 1940PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

This is an action of tort to recover for damage caused to the plaintiff’s building by a fire alleged to have *602been negligently set by the defendants. The Appellate Division for the Northern District found that there was no prejudicial error and ordered the report of the trial judge dismissed..

The defendants, under contract, were engaged in cutting certain pipes that were connected with the heating and power unit in the basement of the plaintiff’s building, and in the performance of this work applied an oxygen-acetylene torch within eight or ten inches of the sheet metal ceiling that covered…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Strong v. Haverhill Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Adamaitis v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. MacDonald v. AdamianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Kennedy Bros. v. BirdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Perry v. HanoverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Stella v. CurtisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  3. Memishian v. PhippsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Rummel v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Brodeur v. SeymourMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API