Legal Opinion
MacDonald v. Adamian
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 1, 1936PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff, “while travelling on the sidewalk in front” of land with buildings thereon owned by the defendants’ intestate, located at 142 Fulton Street at the corner of Valley Street in Medford, by slipping upon ice “formed from water gathered” upon his land and “negligently discharged . . . upon said sidewalk through an artificial channel” upon the property of the defendants’ intestate. The substance of the evidence in' the record is this: The plaintiff testified that he walked up…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Posell v. HerscovitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Weiner v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Field v. GowdyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Mahoney v. NorcrossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Home Savings Bank v. SavranskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Dolham v. PetersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Okin v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Keeney v. CiborowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.