Legal Opinion
Adamaitis v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 8, 1936PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtField, J.
This action of contract was brought in the District Court to recover total and permanent disability benefits under a supplementary contract attached to a life insurance policy. See G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 175, § 24.
The facts that the plaintiff was insured by the defendant under a policy and supplementary total and permanent disability contract, which were in full force when the alleged disability commenced, and that the plaintiff made due proof of claim were admitted by the defendant. The policy and supplementary contract were introduced in evidence. There was evidence that they were issued on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Castano v. LeoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Reid v. DohertyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Bergeron v. ForestMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Perry v. HanoverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Memishian v. PhippsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Home Savings Bank v. SavranskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Biggs v. DensmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Himelfarb v. Novadel Agene Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.