Legal Opinion

Brodeur v. Seymour

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 28, 1944PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

On June 5, 1937, the plaintiff drove his automobile into the defendant’s filling and greasing station, in *528Marlborough to have the springs greased. At the request of the defendant’s attendant, the plaintiff drove the automobile upon a hydraulic lift which was then at the level of the floor. The attendant, to the knowledge of the plaintiff, then left for a few minutes to serve a “gas customer” outside, and in the meantime the plaintiff stood upon the running board of his automobile, cleaning the windshield. Upon the attendant’s return, he saw the plaintiff and said something to the plaintiff by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Perry v. HanoverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Strong v. Haverhill Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Rummel v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Home Savings Bank v. SavranskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. DiGesse v. Columbia Pontiac Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Zarrillo. v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. M. DeMatteo Construction Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. Cooperstein v. Turner Bros. ConstructionMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1992
  5. Lawrence v. O'NeillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API