Rummel v. Peters
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
On March 23, 1940, the plaintiffs, husband and wife, were riding in an automobile operated by the male plaintiff in Brookline, when his automobile was damaged and the female plaintiff was hurt by an automobile operated by the defendant which ran into the rear of the automobile in which they were riding. The defendant concedes that there was evidence of his negligence, and does not now contend that the plaintiffs were guilty of contributory negligence unless it was in operating or riding in an automobile which was not properly registered. VanDresser v. Firlings, 305 Mass. 51, 56. Conningford…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Wong Kim ArkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Williamson v. OsentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- District of Columbia v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Hoffman v. City of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- National Shawmut Bank v. JoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- DiGesse v. Columbia Pontiac Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Gauvin v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Brodeur v. SeymourMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.