Legal Opinion

Berlin v. Emerald Partners

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 12, 1989PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice,

for the majority.

Emerald Partners (“Emerald”), a New Jersey limited partnership, brought this action in the Court of Chancery on March 1, 1988. The defendants are May Petroleum, Inc. (“May”), a Delaware corporation; its three outside directors, David L. Florence, Rex A. Sebastion, and Theodore H. Strauss; and its two inside directors, Craig Hall and Ronald P. Berlin (collectively, “the May Board”). Emerald originally brought this suit individually, and subsequently amended its complaint to allege class and derivative claims.

Emerald sought to enjoin the consummation of a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Giuricich v. Emtrol Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  2. Hibbert v. Hollywood Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. Salt Dome Oil Corp. v. SchenckSupreme Court of Delaware · 1945
  4. American Hardware Corp. v. Savage Arms Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1957
  5. Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows Inc. v. RinglingCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1947

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Emerald Partners v. BerlinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  2. Unitrin, Inc. v. American General Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  3. Cinerama, Inc. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  4. Leal v. MeeksSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  5. Emerald Partners v. BerlinSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API