Legal Opinion

Emerald Partners v. Berlin

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 16, 1999No. 393, 1998PublishedCited by 333 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice:

In this appeal from the Court of Chancery, we review the grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant corporation and its directors, on the ground that the plaintiffs, in their attack on a merger, had not sufficiently pled claims of entire fairness and best price. We conclude that the entire fairness claim was fairly pleaded and is intertwined with disclosure violation claims. Accordingly, we reverse as to the director defendants.

We also conclude that the Court of Chancery correctly ruled that the defendants had been “wrongfully” preliminarily enjoined within the meaning…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  3. Kahn v. Lynch Communication Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  4. Malone v. BrincatSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  5. Rosenblatt v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by333 opinions

  1. Malpiede v. TownsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  2. Orman v. CullmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2002
  3. Gantler v. StephensSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  4. RBC Capital Markets, LLC v. JervisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  5. McCall v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

328 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API