Legal Opinion

Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows Inc. v. Ringling

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided May 3, 1947PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pearson, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

The Court of Chancery was called upon to review an attempted election of directors at the 1946 annual stock holders meeting of the corporate defendant. The pivotal questions concern an agreement between two of the three present stockholders, and particularly the effect of this agreement with relation to the exercise of voting rights by these two stockholders. At the time of the meeting, the corporation had outstanding 1000 shares of capital stock held as follows: 315 by petitioner Edith Conway Ringling; 315 by defendant Aubrey B..Ringling Haley…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  2. In re Giant Portland Cement Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
  3. Brightman v. BatesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  4. Perry v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1937
  5. In re the E. N. Chilson for a Summary Order for Election of Directors of Public Industrials Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  2. Stroud v. GraceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  3. Williams v. GeierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  4. Thorpe by Castleman v. Cerbco, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  5. McDermott Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API