Legal Opinion

Emerald Partners v. Berlin

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 28, 2001No. 96, 2001PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice.

This matter is before us for the third time. The present appeal is from a post-trial final judgment entered by the Court of Chancery. In the second appeal to this Court, we affirmed, in part, but reversed the entry of summary judgment in favor of the director defendants and remanded the case to the Court of Chancery for a trial. 1

In this appeal, the appellants contend that the Court of Chancery failed to follow the mandate of this Court upon remand and erred, as a matter of law, by not conducting an entire fairness analysis in its posttrial opinion. The director defendants…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. Malpiede v. TownsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  4. Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  5. Emerald Partners v. BerlinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. In Re Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  2. Orman v. CullmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2002
  3. Wood v. BaumSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  4. In Re Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2005
  5. RBC Capital Markets, LLC v. JervisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API