Legal Opinion
Cinerama, Inc. v. Technicolor, Inc.
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided July 17, 1995No. 2, 1995PublishedCited by 215 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
Today’s opinion completes a trilogy of decisions by this Court. The ease involves claims by the plaintiff-appellant, Cinerama, Inc. (“Cinerama”), against the directors of Technicolor, Inc. (“Technicolor”) and others. The issues presented relate to the sale of Technicolor to MaeAndrews & Forbes Group, Inc. (“MAF”) in a two-stage tender offer/merger transaction for $23 per share in cash. Cinerama was at all times the owner of 201,200 shares of the common stock of Technicolor, representing 4.405 percent of the total shares outstanding.
Cinerama did not tender its stock in the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by215 opinions
- Malpiede v. TownsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- In Re Caremark International Inc. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1996
- Emerald Partners v. BerlinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
- In Re Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Orman v. CullmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2002
210 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.