Leal v. Meeks
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
STRINE, Chief Justice:
I. INTRODUCTION
These appeals were scheduled for argument on the same day because they turn on a single legal question: in an action for damages against corporate fiduciaries, where the plaintiff challenges an interested transaction that is presumptively subject to entire fairness review, must the plaintiff plead a non-exculpated claim against the disinterested, independent directors to survive a motion to dismiss by those directors? 1 We answer that question in the affirmative. A plaintiff seeking only monetary damages must plead non-exculpated claims against a director…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Malpiede v. TownsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986
- Beam Ex Rel. M. Stewart Living v. StewartSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- Emerald Partners v. BerlinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by154 opinions
- RBC Capital Markets, LLC v. JervisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Sandys Ex Rel. Zynga Inc. v. PincusSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
- Singh v. AttenboroughSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
- SFF-TIR, LLC v. StephensonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017
- In re EZCORP INC. Consulting Agreement Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2016
149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.