Legal Opinion

Hudela v. McNally, No. Cv95 0326958s (Oct. 7, 1996)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 7, 1996No. CV95 0326958SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Plaintiffs, Aimable Hudela and Bronislaw Hudela, commenced this action alleging that the defendants were negligent in causing a motor vehicle accident. Pursuant to § 52-102a of the Connecticut General Statutes, the defendants move to implead Bronislaw Hudela as a third-party defendant in this action.

Pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes § 52-103, the court has the authority to cite in a new party to any pending action. Whether to allow the addition of a party to pending legal proceedings…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schurgast v. SchumannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  2. Senior v. HopeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  3. Jordan v. StephensDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1945
  4. A. Secondino & Son, Inc. v. LoRiccoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  5. Bradford v. HerzigConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API