Legal Opinion
Senior v. Hope
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 30, 1968PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The plaintiff brought this action pursuant to § 52-102a of the General Statutes. The portions which are material to the issue before us appear in the footnote. Two defendants are named in the action, one of whom, David Katz and Sons, Inc., demurred to the complaint on the ground that the action was premature. The trial court sustained the demurrer, the plaintiff failed to plead over, and judgment was rendered in favor of that defendant. The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiff made a written agreement with the two defendants, a copy of which is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rutt v. RocheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- McAdam v. SheldonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Lombardi v. J. A. Bergren Dairy Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Pavelka v. St. Albert Society, Branch No. 30Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Cyr v. Town of BrookfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Mead v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Amodio v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Bouchard v. People's BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Schurgast v. SchumannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.