Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Herzig

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 15, 1994No. 12192PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.

The plaintiffs, Charles S. Bradford and Marjorie K. Bradford,1 are appealing from the judgment of the trial court in a medical malpractice action rendered in accordance with a jury verdict for them against the defendant physician, Steven Herzig. They claim that the trial court improperly accepted the verdict because (1) contributory negligence was not pleaded as a special defense by the defendant, but the jury verdict assigned 30 percent contributory negligence to the plaintiff, and (2) the jury verdict assigned 25 percent of the negligence involved in the plaintiffs harm to Eckhart Doering,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gionfriddo v. Gartenhaus CafeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Gionfriddo v. Gartenhaus CafeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  3. Murray v. KrenzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  4. Delott v. RorabackSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Reilly v. DiBiancoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carroll v. WhitneyTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Donner v. KearseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Tarzia v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. Amsden v. FischerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Munn v. Hotchkiss SchoolDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API