Legal Opinion
Troendle v. Clinch
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 15, 1946No. Civ. No. 15026PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.
The record discloses that an action claiming damages for fraud, was commenced by appellant’s assignor, Isabel M. Troendle, deceased, on September 16, 1929, against several defendants, one of whom is the respondent Clive Preston Thurtle. On October 22, 1929, a judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff in such action and against the defendants Mostyn C. H. Clinch, Clive Preston Thurtle and Grace Donnell, in the sum of $12,625 plus costs of $83.85. This judgment was affirmed by the District Court of Appeal on July 29, 1932. (125 Cal.App. 147 [13 P.2d 852].)
On October 1, 1932, Isabel M.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Demens v. HueneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- McNabb v. McNabbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- McClelland v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Helvey v. CastlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McConnell v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Long v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Shapiro v. CahillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Bank of America v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Kellow v. LaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.