Legal Opinion

CAROLE RING & ASSOCIATES v. Nicastro

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 2001No. B135439PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Defendant and appellant Mario A. Nicastro (Nicastro) appeals an order denying attorney fees and costs after Nicastro prevailed in an arbitration brought by plaintiff and respondent Carole Ring & Associates (Ring). Nicastro seeks attorney fees and costs he incurred at the arbitration level as well as attorney fees and costs incurred in postarbitration judicial proceedings.

The issue is whether a contract providing for arbitration and authorizing attorney fees and costs to the prevailing party may be relied on to support postarbitration attorney fees and costs pursuant to Code…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Moore v. First Bank of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. DiMarco v. ChaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Ling v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Brokerage Co. v. Woodman Investment GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Corona v. Amherst PartnersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Heimlich v. Shivji, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API