Legal Opinion
DiMarco v. Chaney
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 30, 1995No. B075652PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Plaintiffs and appellants Joel DiMarco and Linda DiMarco (collectively, DiMarco) appeal a judgment insofar as it awards $19,575 in attorney fees and other costs to defendant and respondent Dixie N. Chaney (Chaney).
The essential issues are whether the arbitrator exceeded his powers by denying an award of attorney fees and costs to Chaney, and whether the trial court erred in awarding attorney fees and costs to Chaney for the underlying arbitration instead of remanding to the arbitrator for that purpose.
We conclude the arbitrator exceeded his powers in denying Chaney’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Bankes v. LucasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Severtson v. Williams Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Taranow v. BroksteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Lagatree v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Moshonov v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Moore v. First Bank of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Gueyffier v. Ann Summers, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.