Legal Opinion

Heimlich v. Shivji

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided May 31, 2017No. H042641PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, J.*

*155I. INTRODUCTION

The issue presented by this appeal is the recoverability of costs available under Code of Civil Procedure section 998 following an American Arbitration Association ("AAA") award that denied requests by both sides for damages, costs, and attorney fees.1

*578Attorney Alan Heimlich (Attorney) filed this action seeking payment of unpaid fees from his client Shiraz M. Shivji (Client). Client filed an answer and, one year later, asked for arbitration pursuant to his retainer agreement with Attorney. The trial court compelled contractual arbitration that resulted in no recovery…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Kinsman v. Unocal Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Scott Co. of California v. Blount, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Aguilar v. LernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Williams v. Chino Valley Independent Fire DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Heimlich v. ShivjiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Asphalt Prof'ls Inc. v. Davis (In re Davis)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2019
  4. Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes etc.California Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API