Legal Opinion

Corona v. Amherst Partners

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 2003No. D040084PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McINTYRE, J.

The issue presented in this case is one of first impression in California: where a party is required by contract to submit a dispute to binding arbitration, but does not request that the arbitrator decide his entitlement to attorney fees even though that issue was part of the submission, may *704a trial court nonetheless determine that issue and make an award of fees and costs incurred in the arbitration? We answer this question in the negative and affirm the trial court’s denial of the plaintiff’s request for an award of such fees and costs.

Factual and Procedural Background

Juve…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Sapp v. BarenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Ericksen, Arbuthnot, McCarthy, Kearney & Walsh, Inc. v. 100 Oak StreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Moshonov v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Serafin v. Balco Properties Ltd., LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Ling v. P.F. Chang's China Bistro, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Brokerage Co. v. Woodman Investment GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Heimlich v. ShivjiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API