Legal Opinion
Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Brokerage Co. v. Woodman Investment Group
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 17, 2005No. B174696PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERLUSS, P. J.
The trial court denied a petition to confirm an arbitration award filed by Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Brokerage Company, Tony Azzi and John P. Walsh (collectively Marcus & Millichap) and granted the cross-petition to vacate the award filed by Woodman Investment Group, LLC (Woodman) and Eli Sasson, Woodman’s managing partner, on the ground the arbitrator exceeded her authorized powers and the award could not be corrected without affecting the merits of the decision. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1286.2, subd. (a)(4).)1 The court did not issue an order for rehearing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Green v. Mt. Diablo Hospital DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Corona v. Amherst PartnersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- CAROLE RING & ASSOCIATES v. NicastroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Long Beach Iron Works, Inc. v. International Molders & Allied Workers Union of North America, Local 374California Court of Appeal · 1972
3Cited by18 opinions
- Frog Creek Partners, LLC v. Vance Brown, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Otay River Constructors v. San Diego ExpresswayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- SWAB FINANCIAL v. E Trade SecuritiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- MBNA America Bank, N.A. v. GormanAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.