Legal Opinion

Wagner Construction Co. v. Pacific Mechanical Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 2007No. S136255PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

We granted review to consider whether the lower courts properly denied a petition to compel arbitration (Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.2) 1 on the ground the statute of limitations has run on the claims the parties agreed to arbitrate. We hold the lower courts erred. Where, as here, the parties have agreed to arbitrate any dispute arising out of their contract, the affirmative defense that the statute of limitations has run is for the arbitrator rather than the court to decide.

I. Background

On November 21, 1997, defendant Pacific Mechanical Corporation (Pacific) hired plaintiff…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Broughton v. Cigna HealthplansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Saint Agnes Medical Center v. PacifiCare of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Cox v. Ocean View Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Hoover v. American Income Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Young Seok Suh v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Greenspan v. LADT, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API