Legal Opinion

Broughton v. Cigna Healthplans

California Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1999No. S072583PublishedCited by 169 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

In this case we consider whether a claim brought under the Consumers Legal Remedies Acts, Civil Code section 1750 et seq. (CLRA or the Act), may be subject to arbitration. The Court of Appeal concluded that such a claim would not be arbitrable, principally because the CLRA authorizes permanent injunctive relief to enjoin deceptive business practices, and such a remedy is beyond the scope of an arbitrator to grant or properly enforce. We conclude that the Court of Appeal is partially correct that the injunctive relief portion of a CLRA claim is inarbitrable, although for reasons…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by169 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 2015
  3. McGill v. Citibank, N.A.California Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Matthew Kilgore v. Keybank, National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. America Online, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API