Legal Opinion

Hoover v. American Income Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 2012No. E052864PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CODRINGTON, J.

I

INTRODUCTION

Martha Hoover, plaintiff and respondent, worked as a sales agent for about four months for American Income Life Insurance Company (AIL), defendant and appellant. ALL appeals from an order denying its petition to compel arbitration of Hoover’s civil action based on various Labor Code statutes. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1294, subd. (a).)

The underlying issue, which we do not resolve in this appeal, concerns whether Hoover was an employee of AIL or an independent contractor. She claims she was an employee, entitled to receive minimum wage, as well as reimbursement for…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Carbajal v. CWPSC, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Nelsen v. Legacy Partners Residential, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Verdugo v. Alliantgroup, L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Carmax Auto Superstores California LLC v. HernandezDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API