Legal Opinion
County of Washington v. City of Oak Park Heights
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 8, 2012No. A11-0067PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
This case requires us to decide whether certiorari review under Minn.Stat. ch. 606 (2010), is the exclusive method for reviewing a city council’s denial of a request for a refund of an alleged overpayment for sewer and water services. Respondent Washington County (County) filed a claim for reimbursement with appellant City of Oak Park Heights (City), alleging that the City had overcharged the County for sewer and water services. Following consideration at a City Council meeting, the City adopted findings and conclusions, and issued an order denying the County’s claim.…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Spanel v. Mounds View School District No. 621Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Williams v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester, First Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, and the Class of Beneficiaries, Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 573.02 v. The City of Stillwater, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Elisea Cervantes Anzures v. Michele Leann Ward, City of Saint PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.