Elisea Cervantes Anzures v. Michele Leann Ward, City of Saint Paul
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge
Appellant-city challenges the district court’s denial of its motion to dismiss respondent-police officer’s cross-claim seeking defense and indemnification, arguing that the district court erred by determining that it had subject-matter jurisdiction to review the city’s decision that respondent is not entitled to defense and indemnification under Minn. Stat. § 466.07, subd. 1. Because the city’s decision was a quasi-judicial decision and no right of review in the district court is provided by statute or appellate rule, the district court lacked subject-matter…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Graham v. Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- County of Dakota v. CameronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Willis v. County of SherburneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Defense and Indemnification of Alexander Vladimir BrownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025