Legal Opinion

Elisea Cervantes Anzures v. Michele Leann Ward, City of Saint Paul

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 3, 2017No. A16-739PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge

Appellant-city challenges the district court’s denial of its motion to dismiss respondent-police officer’s cross-claim seeking defense and indemnification, arguing that the district court erred by determining that it had subject-matter jurisdiction to review the city’s decision that respondent is not entitled to defense and indemnification under Minn. Stat. § 466.07, subd. 1. Because the city’s decision was a quasi-judicial decision and no right of review in the district court is provided by statute or appellate rule, the district court lacked subject-matter…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Graham v. Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. County of Dakota v. CameronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. Willis v. County of SherburneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Defense and Indemnification of Alexander Vladimir BrownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API