Legal Opinion

Justus v. Atchison

California Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1977No. Docket Nos. L.A. 30574, 30575PublishedCited by 244 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

The principal issue in this case is whether a stillborn fetus is a “person” within the meaning of the wrongful death statute. (Code Civ. Proc., § 377.) An additional question presented is whether the pleadings are sufficient to state a cause of action for emotional shock under the rule of Dillon v. Legg (1968) 68 Cal.2d 728 [69 Cal.Rptr. 72, 441 P.2d 912, 29 A.L.R.3d 1316]. We conclude that both issues should be decided in the negative, and hence that the judgments should be affirmed.

The appeal arises from two factually similar actions for medical malpractice and wrongful death…

2Cases cited91 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by244 opinions

  1. Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Fort Worth Osteopathic Hospital, Inc. v. ReeseTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011

239 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API