Miller v. Woods
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STANIFORTH, J.
Plaintiffs 1 challenge the validity of a regulation (Department of Social Services Manual of Policies and Procedures § 30-463.233c) (MPP) issued by the Director, State Department of Social Services (Department), which denies payment to “housemates” for “protective supervision” services rendered to totally disabled persons. 2 This result is compelled by the Department’s regulation which in effect volunteers the service of live-in housemates with a few, narrowly limited, exceptions.
The challenged regulation provides: “For service authorization purposes, no need for…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Bowman v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Bufil v. Dollar Financial Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Art Movers, Inc. v. Ni West, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Benton v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Reyes v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.