Legal Opinion

Miller v. Woods

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1983No. Docket Nos. 28347, 28164PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STANIFORTH, J.

Plaintiffs 1 challenge the validity of a regulation (Department of Social Services Manual of Policies and Procedures § 30-463.233c) (MPP) issued by the Director, State Department of Social Services (Department), which denies payment to “housemates” for “protective supervision” services rendered to totally disabled persons. 2 This result is compelled by the Department’s regulation which in effect volunteers the service of live-in housemates with a few, narrowly limited, exceptions.

The challenged regulation provides: “For service authorization purposes, no need for…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Bowman v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Bufil v. Dollar Financial Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Art Movers, Inc. v. Ni West, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Benton v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Reyes v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API