Legal Opinion

Fernandes v. Rodriguez

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 10, 1999No. AC 17646PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUPONT, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of partition of real estate, in which the primary issue is whether the trial court could properly order the relief of a payment of money to the named defendant1 by the plaintiff and order the defendant to execute and deliver to the plaintiff a quitclaim deed to the subject premises. The defendant claims that the trial court had no statutory authority2 to render such a judgment because the court was limited to rendering a judgment ordering either partition in kind or a sale of the real estate. We hold that the trial court could properly render…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kakalik v. BernardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Johnson v. OlmstedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
  4. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Wilcox v. Willard Shopping Center AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fernandes v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Fernandes v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. Kubish v. ZegaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Fernandes v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Beasejour v. Biodonne, No. 115481 (Jul. 14, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API