Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Willard Shopping Center Associates

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 19, 1988No. 13372PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.

The named defendant, Willard Shopping Center Associates (Associates), appeals from the judgment of the trial court, on the report and recommendation of an attorney state trial referee, ordering partition by sale of property owned by Associates as tenants in common with the plaintiff Roberto Sandolo.

This dispute involves the disposition of the Willard Shopping Center, a 22,000 square foot strip shopping center in Stamford. Sandolo and the members of Associates operate or formerly operated businesses in the shopping center.1 The shopping center is comprised of *320ten units: eight stores, a bank…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Zapata v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. State v. PerruccioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Johnson v. OlmstedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
  4. In re Juvenile Appeal (85-BC)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Delfino v. VealencisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. Fruin v. Colonnade One At Old Greenwich Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Fernandes v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Fruin v. Colonnade One at Old Greenwich Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. Geib v. McKinneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API