Legal Opinion

Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. Kotkin

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 22, 1981PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendants have appealed from a summary judgment rendered by the trial court for the plaintiff, Hartford National Bank, finding the defendants, David Kotkin, Irving S. Ribicoff, Isidor Rubin, Chester Bland, John B. Abrahms, and Hyman J. Goldfeld, liable to the plaintiff in the amount of $2,243,730.64 plus interest. The six defendants had executed five promissory notes payable to the plaintiff, the obligations being secured by various real and personal property. Upon the defendants’ default, which is undisputed, the plaintiff brought suit on the notes, but did not also bring suit to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Staples v. HendrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  2. Atlas Realty Corporation v. HouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  3. New Haven Savings Bank v. WarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  4. Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. PettisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  5. Mechanics Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. L & R Realty v. Connecticut National BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  3. New England Savings Bank v. Bedford Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. NicholasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. Wendell Corp. Trustee v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API