U. S. Hertz, Inc. v. Niobrara Farms
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GOLDSTEIN, J. *
Plaintiffs U. S. Hertz, Inc. (herein “Hertz”) appeals from an order dissolving a temporary restraining order and denying its motion for a preliminary injunction. Such an order is appealable. (Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd. (f).)
Facts
On July 1, 1971, plaintiff submitted to defendants an offer in writing entitled “Real Estate Purchase Contract and Receipt for Deposit” wherein it offered to purchase from defendant Niobrara Farms (herein “Niobrara”) 1,150 acres of improved agricultural land located in Butte and Tehama Counties. The greater part of the land was owned by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- In Re HochbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Robbins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Garfinkle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Joseph A. Bryant v. Jefferson Federal Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Sciarratta v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- IMO Development Corp. v. Dow Corning Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.