Legal Opinion

In Re Hochberg

California Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1970No. Crim. 14323PublishedCited by 159 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, C. J.

Petitioner and her husband, represented by the same counsel, were jointly tried by jury in municipal court on charges that they wilfully failed to support their three minor children in violation of Penal Code section 270. 1 The Appellate Department of the Los Angeles County Superior Court affirmed the judgments against them without opinion and denied certification to the Court of Appeal.

In this habeas corpus proceeding petitioner contends that she was denied the constitutional right to effective trial counsel. She made this contention in a prior application for habeas…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. In Re SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by159 opinions

  1. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. MirandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API