Legal Opinion

Garfinkle v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1978No. S.F. 23658PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MANUEL, J.

This petition for writ of mandate challenges the constitutionality of California’s procedure for the nonjudicial foreclosure of deeds of trust on real property. Petitioners contend that this procedure permits the deprivation of the trustor’s property without adequate notice or hearing in violation of the due process guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and of article I, section 7 of the California Constitution, We conclude, in agreement with the decisions which have considered this question in relation to California’s nonjudicial…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  3. I. E. Associates v. Safeco Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Coleman v. DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL ADMININISTRATIONCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Phillips v. Youth Development Program, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API