Legal Opinion

Read v. Mortgage Guarantee Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 7, 1936No. Civ. 9989PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiffs, as apartment owners in an “own-your-own” apartment building, filed their ‘ Complaint for Damages for Fraud and Usury”. They attempted to bring the action for the benefit of all of the apartment owners. The complaint and attached exhibits are very voluminous, covering 170 pages of the clerk’s transcript. In the first count, plaintiffs attempted to set forth a cause of action sounding in fraud. Plaintiffs alleged in said first count that defendants had misrepresented the cost of the project and that the entire transaction was a subterfuge to evade the usury laws. In the second…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Consolidated Reservoir & Power Co. v. ScarboroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Esposti v. Rivers Brothers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Matthews v. OrmerdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Patten v. Pepper Hotel Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Alvord v. Spring Valley Gold Co.California Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Anderson v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Fox v. Peck Iron and Metal Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1982
  4. Harris v. Whittier Building & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. ROES v. WongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API