Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Ormerd

California Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1903No. L.A. No. 1291PublishedCited by 25 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This action was originally instituted by Henry Matthews upon a note and mortgage executed to him by the defendants Henry Ormerd and Mary Jane Ormerd. A Us pendens was filed at the commencement of the action. Soon afterwards Henry Matthews died, and the action has been prosecuted by his executrix, Mary Matthews, who was substituted as plaintiff. The defendants did not deny the execution of the note and mortgage set forth in the complaint; but they averred in their answer that at the time of the execution of the mortgage the parties executed another written instrument which defendants averred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. De Wolf v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Sands v. . ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  3. London & San Francisco Bank v. BandmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Inhabitants of Reading v. Inhabitants of WestonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1829
  5. Harralson v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Roesch v. De MotaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Stock v. MeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Willcox v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Westman v. DyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Esposti v. Rivers Brothers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1929

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API