Legal Opinion
In re Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption Litigation
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 10, 1990No. M.D.L. No. 378PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THEIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motions of Exxon Corporation and Atlantic Richfield Corporation to enforce the State of Alaska’s obligations under the settlement agreement (Doc. 1645, 1652); the State of Alaska’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 1733); Alaska’s two motions for protective order (Doc. 1735, 1784). The court held oral argument on May 30, 1990.
Exxon Corporation (Exxon) and Atlantic Richfield Corporation (ARCO) have filed separate motions to enforce Alaska’s obligations under the Final Settlement Agreement. The motions seek similar relief…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rosewell v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Butcher v. Gerber Products Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. AlaskaTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1991
- Murfin v. United States Department of EnergyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995