Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNary
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist
In this action we are required to reconcile two somewhat intermittent and conflicting lines of authority as to whether a damages action may be brought under 42 U. S. C. § 1988 to redress the allegedly unconstitutional administration of a state tax system. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri held that such suits were barred by both 28 U. S. C. § 1841 (Tax Injunction Act) and the prin*102ciple of comity, and the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed by an equally divided court sitting en banc.1 We granted certiorari to resolve a conflict among the Courts…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by680 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Home Builders Ass'n of Mississippi, Inc. v. City of MadisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
675 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.