Legal Opinion

Rosewell v. LaSalle National Bank

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1981No. 79-1157PublishedCited by 521 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

The Tax Injunction Act of 1937 provides that “[t]he district courts shall not enjoin, suspend or restrain the assessment, levy or collection of any tax under State law where a plain, speedy and efficient remedy may be had in the courts of such State.” 28 U. S. C. § 1341. The question we must decide in this case is whether an Illinois remedy which requires property owners contesting their property taxes to pay under protest and if successful obtain a refund without interest in two years is “a plain, speedy and efficient remedy” within the meaning of the Act.1

I

LaSalle National Bank is trustee…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Perez v. LedesmaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by521 opinions

  1. Home Builders Ass'n of Mississippi, Inc. v. City of MadisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Hibbs v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. California v. Grace Brethren ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

516 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API