Rosewell v. LaSalle National Bank
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
The Tax Injunction Act of 1937 provides that “[t]he district courts shall not enjoin, suspend or restrain the assessment, levy or collection of any tax under State law where a plain, speedy and efficient remedy may be had in the courts of such State.” 28 U. S. C. § 1341. The question we must decide in this case is whether an Illinois remedy which requires property owners contesting their property taxes to pay under protest and if successful obtain a refund without interest in two years is “a plain, speedy and efficient remedy” within the meaning of the Act.1
I
LaSalle National Bank is trustee…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Perez v. LedesmaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by521 opinions
- Home Builders Ass'n of Mississippi, Inc. v. City of MadisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hibbs v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- California v. Grace Brethren ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
516 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.