Legal Opinion

Butcher v. Gerber Products Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 2, 1998No. 98 Civ. 1819(RWS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiffs have moved for a preliminary injunction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 65 prohibiting Defendant Gerber Products Company (“Gerber”) from discontinuing any severance benefits to Plaintiff Daniel J. Vel-kovieh (“Velkovich”) and from seeking repayment of severance benefits which have already been paid to him. Plaintiffs have also moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f) to strike Gerber’s Third Separate Defense, which asserts a defense of waiver. For the reasons set forth below, the motion for preliminary injunction is converted to a motion for summary judgment…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. McCormack v. IBMDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  3. Kruchowski v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. Kruchowski v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. Campbell v. Amana Co., LPDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API