Legal Opinion
In Re Bingham
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 25, 2005No. 04-BG-920PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has recommended that William Bingham be informally admonished for violating several Rules of Professional Conduct in connection with his representation of an estate. Bar Counsel noted an exception to the Board’s recommendation, arguing that Bingham should be publicly censured and ordered to pay full restitution to his clients in the amount of $250.00 plus interest. 1 We do not adopt the Board’s recommendation, and agree with Bar Counsel that Bingham should be required to make full restitution. Therefore, we conclude that Bingham, shall be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re AustinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In Re McLainDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Matter of DoryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re WrightDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re ElginDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re ManceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In Re ColeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In re OmwengaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.