Legal Opinion
In Re Steele
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 17, 2005No. 03-BG-808, 04-BG-395PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Senior Judge:
In response to a number of complaints made to the Office of Bar Counsel against respondent by private citizens and a judicial officer, Bar Counsel, after investigation, presented evidence of multiple violations of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct (“Rules”) to three hearing committees. There is little, if any, dispute about the underlying factual accounts surrounding respondent’s professional conduct in these matters. Thus, the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) adopted the findings of fact and conclusion of law of each hearing committee.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re CorizziDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re AustinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re UkwuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re ChapmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re SamadDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- In re BradleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In Re KlineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.