Legal Opinion
McDonough v. Cooper
California Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1918No. Sac. No. 2736PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion- of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
Action to quiet title to two parcels of land in the city of Modesto. The court gave judgment declaring defendant, Ida B. Cooper, to be the owner of the property. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment.
The plaintiff deraigned title from the United States. The defendant, Cooper, claimed under a deed following a sale for nonpayment of an assessment levied by the Modesto Irrigation District for the year 1905.
Section 48 of the act under which the sale was had makes the collector’s deed, duly acknowledged and proved, prima facie evidence that the proceedings were regular in seven specified…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Imperial Land Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Escondido High School District v. Escondido Seminary of University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hall v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Dougery v. BettencourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Jones v. SturzenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Woody v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Hall v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948