Legal Opinion
Jones v. Sturzenberg
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 16, 1922No. Civ. No. 2519PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The land in controversy was assessed in 1913 to A. M. and E. L. Miller and, the taxes thereon becoming delinquent, the land was duly sold to the state in 1914 for the sum of $50.21. In 1914 the land was assessed to E. L. Walker and Wm. T. Parker and, on their failure to pay the taxes for that year, the land was again sold to the state in 1915, contrary to the express provisions of section 3814 of the Political Code. All subsequent taxes were allowed to become delinquent up to the year 1918, when the then owner applied to the county auditor for an estimate of the sum necessary to redeem. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. Royal Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Beck v. Meroney.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Skidmore v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hossom v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Wilcox v. WesterheideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Utah Lead Co. v. Piute CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1937
- National Holding Co. v. Title Insurance & Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Skidmore v. DambacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.